Bombay High Court
CP/649/2015 of VAIJINATH BAPURAO SARWADE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 7 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.649 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1646/2010 VAIJINATH BAPURAO SARWADE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr.D.R.Jayabhar AGP for respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde … CORAM :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
649.15CP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO.649 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1646/2010 VAIJINATH BAPURAO SARWADE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr.D.R.Jayabhar AGP for respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde …
CORAM :
SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 07.10.2026 P.C. :
The learned AGP placed on record communication dated 16th September, 2026 mentioning that rental compensation has been decided and the amount is also received, if the petitioner approaches the office of acquiring body then the compensation amount will be paid to him.
The learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to approach the concerned acquiring body for getting amount of said rental compensation. 2026:BHC-AUG:47745-DB
649.15CP
In view of the same, nothing survives in this petition and the same stands disposed of.
The petitioner being legal heir of the original claimant is permitted to withdraw the said amount on producing necessary documents. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC