Bombay High Court
CA/562/2025 of MUKUND SANDIPAN TAMBE DIED THR LRS SAVITA MUKUND TAMBE AND ORS Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. COLLECTOR OSMANABAD AND ORS. on 7 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL NO. 2248 OF 2018 The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project Majbutikaran Division, Omerga And Ors VERSUS Yadav Pandurang Tambe WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 555 OF 2025 IN FA/2248/2018 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6650 OF 2020 IN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2248 OF 2018
The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project Majbutikaran Division, Omerga And Ors
VERSUS
Yadav Pandurang Tambe
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 555 OF 2025
IN FA/2248/2018
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6650 OF 2020
IN FA/2248/2018
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO.2254 OF 2018
The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project Majbutikaran Division, Omerga And Ors
VERSUS
Mukund Sandipan Tambe
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6651 OF 2020
IN FA/2254/2018
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 562 OF 2025
IN FA/2254/2018
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 564 OF 2025
IN FA/2254/2018
AND
The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project Majbutikaran Division, Omerga And Ors
VERSUS
Ahmed Lala Mulani
2026:BHC-AUG:48641
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO. 2249 OF 2018
The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project Majbutikaran Division, Omerga And Ors
VERSUS
Arun Nana Tambe (died)
Through L.Rs.Anita Arun Tambe and others WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 557 OF 2025
IN FA/2249/2018
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO.2244 OF 2018
The Executive Engineer, Irrigation Project Majbutikaran Division, Omerga And Ors
VERSUS
Sow. Sulochana Pandit Tambe
----
Mr.G.B.Rajale, Advocate for appellants – acquiring body Mr.R.V.Naiknavare, Advocate for respondent - claimants
----
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATE : OCTOBER 07, 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :-
These First Appeals arise out of the common judgment and award dated 27.08.2014, passed by learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad. Feeling aggrieved by the enhancement granted by the Reference Court, the acquiring body has filed these First Appeals.
2. The details of the appeals are as under :- Sr. No. First Appeal No. L.A.R. Number Date of decision in L.A.R. Area acquired
27.08.2014 Gut No.119-71 R (non irrigated); Gut No.111-2 H 39 R (irrigated)
2254 of 2018 600 of 2012 27.08.2014 Gut No.115-27 R
27.08.2014 Gut No.102-79 R; Gut No.103-28 R
27.08.2014 Gut No.108-18 R; Gut No.112-22 R; Gut No.113-18 R
2244 of 2018 618 of 2012 27.08.2014 Gut No.105-70 R
3. During the course of hearing, learned advocate for both sides submit that the rate granted by the reference court is within four times than the rate granted by the Special Land Acquisition Officer. As such, they submit that the First Appeals are covered by the Government Resolution dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigenda dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018.
4. In view of the above, the First Appeals are disposed of in terms of the following order:- A) The First Appeals are partly allowed
B) The judgment and award passed by the Reference Court need not be interfered with, subject to the right of the claimants to seek enhancement in their separate independent First Appeals. C) The interest part shall be governed as per the principles laid down by the Full Bench of this court in State of Maharashtra Vs. Kailas Shiva Rangari, 2016(4) All MR 513. D) The amount deposited by the appellant/acquiring body is permitted to be withdrawn by the claimants by furnishing usual undertaking to the satisfaction of learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. E) Needless to mention, the withdrawal of the deposited amount shall be along with interest accrued thereon. F) Disbursement of the amount shall be after adjustment of interest as per the principles laid down in Kailash Rangari’s case (supra) on the part of interest. [AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.] ………..
KBP