Bombay High Court
APPLN/406/2023 of SWAPNIL DATTATRAYA JOSHI AND OTHERS Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER on 7 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 960 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 406 OF 2023 Swapnil Dattatraya Joshi And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another Mr. A . A . Puranik, Advocate for Applicants Mrs. R. P. Gour, APP for Respondent No. 1/State Mr. S. P. Pathak, Advocate for
960-APPLN-406-2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
960 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 406 OF 2023
Swapnil Dattatraya Joshi And Others
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
Mr. A. A. Puranik, Advocate for Applicants Mrs. R. P. Gour, APP for Respondent No. 1/State Mr. S. P. Pathak, Advocate for Respondent No. 2
CORAM :R.M. JOSHI, J
DATE
:OCTOBER 07, 2026
P. C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Counsels for both sides, on instruction, make statement that parties have settled the dispute.
2. Learned Counsel for Respondent No. 2/Informant records no objection for allowing the Application. Affidavit has been filed to that extent by Informant.
3. Learned APP opposed the application.
4. Since the dispute between the parties is matrimonial and parties have arrived at settlement, this Court finds no justification not to accept the settlement.
5. In view of above, application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’. (R. M. JOSHI, J.) Malani
2026:BHC-AUG:47064-DB