Bombay High Court
WP/10672/2022 of SHRINIVAS KISHANRAO PATIL Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS on 7 October 2026
15, 35 & 36.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8 WRIT PETITION NO. 12775 OF 2026 Radhika Dipak Ahire And Another VERSUS The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others ... Mr. Sanjay R. Kolhare, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP
Sr. Nos.8, 15, 35 & 36.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
8 WRIT PETITION NO. 12775 OF 2026
Radhika Dipak Ahire And Another
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
...
Mr. Sanjay R. Kolhare, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Anup R. Nikam, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
…
AND
15 WRIT PETITION NO. 11696 OF 2022
Iram Afreen Abdul Samad
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others
...
Mr. Irfan D. Maniyar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. N. S. Tekale, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Anup R. Nikam, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
Mr. N. S. Kadam, Advocate for Respondent No.4.
Ms. Yogita S. Thorat, Advocate for Respondent No.5.
...
AND
35 WRIT PETITION NO. 9747 OF 2022
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3671 OF 2026 IN WP/9747/2022
Vinod Premsing Chavan
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra Through Its Principal Secretary And Others
...
Mr. Irfan D. Maniyar, Advocate for the Petitioner-Applicant.
Mr. N. S. Tekale, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Anup R. Nikam, Advocate for Respondent No.2.
…
Sayyed
2026:BHC-AUG:47519-DB
Sr. Nos.8, 15, 35 & 36.doc
AND
36 WRIT PETITION NO. 10672 OF 2022
Shrinivas Kishanrao Patil
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others
...
Mr. Irfan D. Maniyar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Anup R. Nikam, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
Ms. Yogita Thorat, Advocate for Respondent No.5.
...
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT &
JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE
: 7th OCTOBER, 2026
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard learned advocate for the petitioner.
2. The learned advocate for the petitioner informs that the case is covered by the judgment passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.9430 of 2022 and other connected matters.
3. Considering above, these petitions can be conveniently disposed of without notice to the respondents. Petitions stand disposed of in terms of the judgment and order dated 30.09.2026 in Writ Petition No.9430 of 2022.
4. In view of disposal of the petitions, pending civil applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (JITENDRA JAIN, J.) (KISHORE C. SANT, J.) Sayyed