Bombay High Court

BA/941/2026 of DEEPAK DINKAR KAMBLE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. on 16 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 940 OF 2026 Menaka Manohar Mane … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 941 OF 2026 Deepak Dinkar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 940 OF 2026

Menaka Manohar Mane

…

Applicant

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

…

Respondents

WITH

CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 941 OF 2026

Deepak Dinkar Kamble

…

Applicant

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

…

Respondents

Mr. Pratik Tare i/by Mr. Sachin Y. Mane for the Applicants.

Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, APP for the State in BA/940/2026.

Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for the State in BA/941/2026.

CORAM

: ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATED

: OCTOBER 16, 2026

P.C.:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicants, states that the subject matter of these Applications is Crime No. 393 of 2026 registered at Ichalkaranji Police Station, Kolhapur. He, therefore, requests that these Applications be taken up together and disposed of by a common order. This request is confirmed by Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, learned APP for the State in Criminal Bail Application No. 940 of 2026, VRJ

and Mr. N. B. Patil, learned APP for the State in Criminal Bail Application No. 941 of 2026

2. Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicants, states that the Applicant in Criminal Bail Application No. 940 of 2026 is Accused No. 1 and the Applicant in Criminal Bail Application No. 941 of 2026 is Accused No. 2 in Crime No. 393 of 2026.

3. Mr. Pratik Tare, on instructions from the Applicants in both these Applications, seeks leave to withdraw the present Applications with liberty to file fresh Bail Applications before the Trial Court on the ground of change in circumstances. This request is not opposed by Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, learned APP for the State in Criminal Bail Application No. 940 of 2026, and Mr. N. B. Patil, learned APP for the State in Criminal Bail Application No. 941 of 2026.

4. In view of the statement made by Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicants, leave is granted to withdraw these Applications with liberty to file fresh Bail Applications before the Trial Court on the grounds stated by Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicants.

5. If fresh Bail Applications are filed before the Trial Court, the same VRJ

be considered on their own merits and in accordance with law.

6. Criminal Bail Application No. 940 of 2026 and Criminal Bail Application No. 941 of 2026 stand disposed of as withdrawn.

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) VRJ

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead