Bombay High Court
APPLN/36/2026 of SHAKTI VIKRAM BHOSALE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER on 16 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2026 Shakti Vikram Bhosale …...Applicant VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another …...Respondents
10-APPLN-36-2026 (CR).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CR. APPLICATION NO. 36 OF 2026
Shakti Vikram Bhosale
…...Applicant
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another …...Respondents _________________________________________________________________
Mr. Mahantesh Kole, for Applicant.
Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, A.P.P., for Respondent No.1 – State.
API, Mr. Ashok Chavan, Juna Rajwada Police Station, District Kolhapur, present.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM
: ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE
: 16th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Mahantesh Kole, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, learned A.P.P., for Respondent No.1 - State.
2. Mr. Mahantesh Kole, learned Advocate for the Applicant, submits that the Applicant is essentially challenging the order dated 30th September 2026 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, granting anticipatory bail to Respondent No. 2, on the ground that Respondent No. 2 has breached the bail conditions.
3. Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, learned A.P.P. for Respondent No. 1– State, relying upon the decision of this Court in the case of Dharmendrakumar Devishankar Dubey Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Shantanu S. Dhudum
10-APPLN-36-2026 (CR).DOC Anr1., submits that, if the Applicant intends to seek cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to Respondent No. 2 on the ground of violation of the bail conditions, the appropriate course would be to approach the same Court that granted the bail..
4. Based on the above contention of Dr. Ashvini A. Takalkar, learned A.P.P. for Respondent No.1 - State, Mr. Mahantesh Kole, learned Advocate for the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw this Application, with liberty to approach the Court of the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, by filing an Application seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to Respondent No. 2, on the ground that Respondent No. 2 has breached / violated the order dated 30th September 2026 passed in Criminal Bail Application No. 860 of 2026.
5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Mahantesh Kole, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Application with liberty as prayed for. If an Application seeking cancellation of Anticipatory bail is filed before the Trial Court, the same shall be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.
6. Criminal Application No.36 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn. ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) 1 Criminal Application No.29 of 2024 decided on 12th June, 2025. Shantanu S. Dhudum