Bombay High Court
FA/1424/2002 of MAHADEO BALKU BHOSALE Vs RANJANA BALASO JAGTAP and ORS. on 16 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1424 OF 2002 Mahadeo Balku Bhosale …...Appellant VERSUS Ranjana Balaso Jagtap And Ors. …...Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3376 OF 2002 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1424
18-FA-1424-2002 (C).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1424 OF 2002
Mahadeo Balku Bhosale …...Appellant
VERSUS
Ranjana Balaso Jagtap And Ors. …...Respondents WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3376 OF 2002
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1424 OF 2002
Mahadeo Balku Bhosale …........Applicant VERSUS.
Smt. Ranjana Balaso Jagtap And Ors. ….......Respondents
-----
Dr. Uday Warunjikar (Through VC) a/w Adv. N. G. Kamble, for Appellant.
Ms. Varsha Chavan (Through VC), for Respondent No.7 – Insurance Company.
-----
CORAM
: ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE
: 16th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Dr. Uday Warunjikar, learned Advocate for the Appellant, and Ms. Varsha Chavan, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 7–Insurance Company
2. By the present Appeal, the Appellant has challenged the judgment and award dated 3rd July 2001 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangli, in M.A.C.P. No. 29 of 1992. Shantanu S. Dhudum
18-FA-1424-2002 (C).DOC
3. Dr. Uday Warunjikar, learned Advocate for the Appellant, tenders a photocopy of the order dated 28th September 2021 passed by the District Judge-2 and Member, M.A.C.T., Sangli, in M.A.C.P. Darkhast No. 003 of 2002, whereby the said Darkhast is dismissed for default, same is taken on record and marked with “X” for identification.
4. Dr. Uday Warunjikar, learned Advocate for the Appellant, submits that, in view of the order dated 28th September 2021 passed in M.A.C.P. Darkhast No. 003 of 2002 (“X”), nothing remains for consideration in this Appeal. He, therefore, submits that this First Appeal has become infructuous and may be disposed of accordingly. Ms. Varsha Chavan, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 7–Insurance Company, does not oppose the request made by Dr. Uday Warunjikar, learned Advocate for the Appellant.
5. In view of the statement made by Dr. Uday Warunjikar, learned Advocate for the Appellant, First Appeal No. 1424 of 2002 stands dismissed as infructuous.
6. All pending Civil Applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum