Bombay High Court

IA/1630/2026 of VAISHALI SUDHAKAR MORE AND ORS. Vs THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. THR. DIVISIONAL MANAGER on 15 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1630 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 978 OF 2026 Vaishali Sudhakar More and others .. Applicants Versus The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Through Divisional Manager

1 67-IA-1630-2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1630 OF 2026

IN

FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 978 OF 2026

Vaishali Sudhakar More and others

.. Applicants

Versus

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

Through Divisional Manager

.. Respondent

Shri Santosh Dattatray Bhosale, Advocate a/w Shri Amol S.

Deshinge, Advocate for the Applicants.

Shri P. D. Alwekar, Advocate a/w Shri A. S. Jambilkar, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1.

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 15TH OCTOBER, 2026.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

FINAL ORDER :

. Heard both sides.

2. Applicants seek to withdraw an amount of Rs. 80,12,103/- deposited by the respondent No. 1 – Insurance company.

3. For the reasons stated in the application the amount is sought to be withdrawan. It is the case of death and the quantum is just and proper.

4. The application is opposed on the ground that the claim is 2026:BHC-KOL:10074

2 67-IA-1630-2026 totally unfounded. The monthly income of the deceased is vulnerable. The Tribunal awarded exorbitant compensation. The entitlement of claimants is also disputed.

5. It is a case of death claim. Prima facie, applicants are said to be dependents upon the deceased. Considering overall conspectus of the matter, it would be appropriate to permit the applicants to withdraw 70% of the amount deposited with accrued interest.

6. Interim application is partly allowed permitting the applicants to receive 70% of the amount deposited with accrued interest on furnishing undertaking to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional tribunal. Balance amount shall be invested in any nationalized bank. Interim application stands disposed of. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ]

bsb/Oct. 26

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead