Bombay High Court
IA/1538/2026 of PUNDALIK YASHWAWNT AYARE AND ORS Vs THE KOLHAPUR MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT , KOLHAPUR THRU THE INCHARGE LABOUR OFFICER SANJAY D INAMDAR on 15 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1538 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10406 OF 2019 Pundalik Yashwawnt Ayare and others .. Applicants Versus The Kolhapur Municipal Transport , Kolhapur Through The
1 64-IA-1538-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1538 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 10406 OF 2019
Pundalik Yashwawnt Ayare and others
.. Applicants
Versus
The Kolhapur Municipal Transport ,
Kolhapur Through The Incharge Labour
Officer Sanjay D Inamdar
.. Respondent
Shri Uday Jadhav, Advocate a/w Shri Pushkar U. Jadhav, Advocate for the Applicants.
Shri Abhijit Adgule, Advocate a/w Ms. Ketaki Patil, Advocate for the Respondent.
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 15TH OCTOBER, 2026.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
FINAL ORDER :
. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.
2. Applicants are claiming disbursement of amount deposited by the respondent – Corporation to the tune of Rs. 25,57,195/- deposited in this Court.
3. This Court granted interim relief vide order dated 07.03.2026 observing that the respondent – corporation was willing to deposit the amount as per its calculations. It is recorded in the order dated 13.03.2026 that the workmen and other staff members who are the applicants before 2026:BHC-KOL:10127
2 64-IA-1538-2026 this Court are enlisted at Exhibit – X.
4. According to the learned counsel for the applicants the amount of Rs. 25,57,195/- is deposited by the respondent – corporation.
5. Learned counsel for the respondent – corporation has objection for disbursement of the amount.
6. I have perused the list at Exhibit X, which is comprising of supervisory staff as well as non supervisory staff. The corporation has deposited the amount as per its calculations which can be said to be admissible outstanding. The rest of the claim of the applicants is disputed by the respondent – corporation. The list at Exhibit X shows the payable amount to individual applicant.
7. I do not find any impediment in disbursing the amount admissible and payable to the individual applicant as calculated against them in the column headed by payable sum (ns; jDde).
8. Interim application is allowed partly permitting the applicants to receive the amount as per the list and as per the figure shown in the column against their name as payable sum. Interim application stands disposed of. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ]
bsb/Oct. 26