Bombay High Court
APEAL/18/2006 of NANDKUMAR MAHADEO PAWAR Vs BHARAT DATTATRAYA LOHAR AND ANR. on 15 October 2026
(CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2006 Nandkumar Mahadeo Pawar ... Appellant VERSUS Bharat Dattatraya Lohar and another. ... Respondents … Mr. Dattatraya Devkar i/by Mr. Milind
205-APEAL-18-2006 (CR).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 18 OF 2006
Nandkumar Mahadeo Pawar
... Appellant
VERSUS
Bharat Dattatraya Lohar and another.
... Respondents
…
Mr. Dattatraya Devkar i/by Mr. Milind Deshmukh, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Anand S. Shalgaonkar, APP for Respondent No. 2-State.
…
CORAM
: ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.
DATE
: OCTOBER 15, 2026
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned Advocate for the Appellant and learned APP for the Respondent-State submit that this is an Appeal against the acquittal order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vaduj, District-Satara for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
2. They further submit that, in view of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran etc., [2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320] (for short, “Celestium”), the appeal would lie before the learned Sessions Court having jurisdiction to try and entertain the same and therefore urge that the matter be transferred to said Court. Shubham
205-APEAL-18-2006 (CR).doc
3. In view of the above submissions and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Celestium (supra), I deem it appropriate to transfer the Appeal to the learned Sessions Court, Satara, which has the jurisdiction to try and entertain the appeal.
4. Consequently, the present Appeal, along with the Record and Proceedings, if received, is to be transferred to the learned Sessions Court, Satara. (If the Record and Proceedings are lying with the Principal Seat at Bombay, in that case also transfer them to the concerned Sessions Court.)
5. The Officer on Special Duty/Incharge Registrar (J), Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, is directed to take appropriate steps to transfer this matter/proceeding to the learned Sessions Court, Satara.
6. Having considered the pendency of this Appeal since 2006, the learned Sessions Court is directed to make an endeavour to dispose of the matter/proceeding as expeditiously as possible.
7. In view of the above, no case/matter is pending before this Court; accordingly, this Court has disposed of this proceeding.
8. Interim Application/s, if any, pending also stands disposed of.
9. Inform the concerned Sessions Court accordingly. (ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) Shubham