Bombay High Court
WP/1000/2026 of DNYANDEO KRUSHNA VARPE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. SECRETARY REVENUE DEPT. on 14 October 2026
(C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1000 OF 2026 Dnyandeo Krushna Varpe … Petitioner V/s. The State Of Maharashtra through Secretary Revenue Dept. … Respondents ... None for the Petitioner.
7-WP-1000-2026 (C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1000 OF 2026
Dnyandeo Krushna Varpe
… Petitioner
V/s.
The State Of Maharashtra
through Secretary Revenue Dept.
… Respondents
...
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. P. Kakade, additional G.P. with Mr. K. S. Thorat, AGP for Respondent-State.
...
CORAM
:
ABHAY AHUJA &
NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
DATE
:
14th OCTOBER, 2026
P.C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. None for the Petitioner.
2. On 15th September 2026, this Court, observing that the Petition was misconceived as the Petitioner had an appropriate remedy under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, passed the following order: “1. By the present petition, the grievance is about the mutation entry in respect of the subject land. The petition is wholly misconceived, as the Petitioner has an appropriate remedy under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
2. However, in order to afford an opportunity of hearing to the Petitioner, stand over on 14th October 2026, under the caption of ‘Directions’.” Suresh 1/2
7-WP-1000-2026 (C).doc
3. As can be seen, despite an opportunity having been afforded to the Petitioner after observing that the Petition was misconceived, the matter has been listed under the caption for directions.
4. However, since none appears, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. (NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J) (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) Suresh 2/2