Bombay High Court
CP/117/2026 of Hanjala Jahid Kadri Vs Jahid Mustafa Kadri and Anr. on 14 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONT. PETITION NO. 117 OF 2026 IN CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2378 OF 2024 Hanjala Jahid Kadri …...Petitioner Versus Jahid Mustafa Kadri & Anr. …...Respondents
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONT. PETITION NO. 117 OF 2026
IN
CR. WRIT PETITION NO. 2378 OF 2024
Hanjala Jahid Kadri
…...Petitioner
Versus
Jahid Mustafa Kadri & Anr.
…...Respondents
——————
Mr. Abhaykumar Apte for Petitioner.
Mr. Niranjan Tiwari a/w. Mr. Rohit Rajput for Respondent No.1.
——————
Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
Date : 14th October 2026.
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Abhaykumar Apte, learned Advocate for the Petitioner and Mr. Niranjan Tiwari, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.1.
2. The present Contempt Petition has been filed by the Petitioner on account of the delay on the part of Respondent No. 1 to comply with the Order dated 7th May 2025 passed by this Court in Criminal Writ Petition No. 2378 of 2024. The Petitioner is the son of the Respondent No.1. osk 1 of
3. Mr. Niranjan Tiwari, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.1, submits that, pursuant to the Order dated 5th October 2026, the Respondent has paid the entire amount of arrears to the Petitioner.
4. To clarify, Mr. Niranjan Tiwari, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.1, submits that an amount of Rs. 20,000/- was deposited in the account of Ms. Munira Nafil Patankar on 6th October 2026 and the balance amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- has been paid to the Petitioner today, by way of Demand Draft No. 067707 dated 13th October 2026, drawn in favour of Petitioner (Hanjala Jahid Kadri).
5. Mr. Abhaykumar Apte, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, acknowledges the receipt of the original Demand Draft dated 13th October 2026 and has endorsed such acknowledgment on the photostat copy of the Demand Draft, which Mr. Abhaykumar Apte and Mr. Niranjan Tiwari, jointly tender to this Court. The same is taken on record and marked as “X” for identification.
6. Upon payment of Rs. 1,20,000/-, the maintenance as per the Order dated 7th May 2025 stands paid up to September 2026.
7. Mr. Niranjan Tiwari, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.1, on instructions, states that the Respondent No.1 shall abide by the Order dated 7th May 2025 and pay the amount as and when due to the Petitioner. The osk 2 of statement made on behalf of the Respondent No.1 is accepted as an undertaking to this Court.
8. In view of the above, Mr. Abhaykumar Apte, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, does not press the present Contempt Petition and fairly states that the Applicant does not intend to pursue the same. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this Contempt Petition.
9. As the subject matter of the present Petition is between a father and his son and further the order dated 7th May 2025 being complied with, it would be in the interest of justice to dispose of this Contempt Petition on the basis of the statements made by Mr. Abhaykumar Apte, learned Advocate for the Petitioner.
10. The Contempt Petition No. 117 of 2026 is disposed of. [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] osk 3 of