Bombay High Court
WP/1594/2020 of BHARAT VILAS APRADH AND ANR Vs SUSHILA MOHAN APRADH AND ORS on 14 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 819 OF 2023 Bharat Vilas Apradh And Anr ...Petitioners Versus Yashwant Ramchandra Apradh And Ors ...Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 30802 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
911-WP-819-2023 (C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 819 OF 2023 Bharat Vilas Apradh And Anr ...Petitioners Versus Yashwant Ramchandra Apradh And Ors ...Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 30802 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 819 OF 2023 Bharat Vilas Apradh And Anr …Applicants Versus Yashwant Ramchandra Apradh And Ors ...Respondents WRIT PETITION NO. 12785 OF 2019 Bharat Vilas Apradh & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus Sushila Mohan Apradh & Ors. ...Respondents WRIT PETITION NO. 1594 OF 2020 Bharat Vilas Apradh & Anr. ...Petitioners Versus Sushila Mohan Apradh & Ors. ...Respondents WRIT PETITION NO. 12782 OF 2019 Bharat Vilas Apradh And Anr ...Petitioners Versus Yashwant Ramchandra Apradh And Ors ...Respondents ….. Adv. Yuvraj Narvankar a/w Adv. Rahul C. Patil, for Petitioners. Adv. Sandeep Koregave a/w Adv. Swaroop Karade and Adv. Sakshi Patil, for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. ZIP
911-WP-819-2023 (C).doc Adv. Padmanabh D. Pise, for Respondent No.4. …..
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 14th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C. : The Writ Petition Nos. 1594 of 2020, WP/12785/2019 and WP/12782/2019 are not on Board. Taken on Board.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions of his client, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to raise the contentions as is permissible in law.
3. The petitions are disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
4. In view of disposal of writ petitions, pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] ZIP