Bombay High Court
IA/1678/2026 of BHIMRAO SHIVAJI CHAVAN Vs HINDURAO NAMDEV PISAL AND ORS on 14 October 2026
(C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1678 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION ST NO. 4286 OF 2026 Bhimrao Shivaji Chavan … Petitioner V/s. Hindurao Namdev Pisal & Ors. … Respondents ... Mr.
903-IA-1678-2026 (C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1678 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION ST NO. 4286 OF 2026
Bhimrao Shivaji Chavan
… Petitioner
V/s.
Hindurao Namdev Pisal & Ors.
… Respondents
...
Mr. Mahesh Vijay Rawool with Mr. Neeraj lavte, advocate for Applicant.
Mr. V. G. Badgujar, AGP for Respondent-State.
…
CORAM
:
ABHAY AHUJA &
NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
DATE
:
14th OCTOBER, 2026
P.C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This Interim Application seeks restoration of the Writ Petition, which came to be dismissed by virtue of a self-operative order dated 15th September 2026 for failure to remove the office objections within the time granted.
2. When the matter is called out, Mr. Mahesh Rawool, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant, submits that the office objections could not be removed within the time granted, as directed, due to his own fault, and prays that this Court may condone the delay.
3. Learned counsel for the Applicant further submits that, if the Suresh 1/2
903-IA-1678-2026 (C).doc delay is not condoned, the Petitioner will suffer irreparable prejudice, and prays that this Court may condone the delay subject to reasonable terms.
4. Mr. V. G. Badgujar, learned AGP appearing for the State, leaves it to the orders of the Court.
5. Having heard the learned counsel and having considered the submissions, and observing that the office objections could not be removed in time due to the fault of the advocate, resulting in the dismissal of the Petition, and being mindful of the settled law that a litigant should not suffer for the fault of an advocate, this Court is inclined to allow the Interim Application, subject to payment of costs.
6. Accordingly, subject to payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- to the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench Bar Association Ad-hoc Committee within a period of two weeks, the delay is condoned, and the Writ Petition is restored to file.
7. Subject to the above, let the office objections be removed and the registration number be obtained within a period of two weeks.
8. Interim Application accordingly stands allowed and disposed as above. (NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J) (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) Suresh 2/2