Bombay High Court
BA/959/2026 of TUSHAR ZUMBAR JADHAWAR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. on 14 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 959 OF 2026 Tushar Zumbar Jadhawar and Anr. …...Applicant VERSUS. The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. …...Respondents ----- Mr. Jaydeep Mane, for Applicant.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 959 OF 2026
Tushar Zumbar Jadhawar and Anr.
…...Applicant
VERSUS.
The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. …...Respondents
-----
Mr. Jaydeep Mane, for Applicant.
Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, APP, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State.
PSI, Mr. S. S. Gavali, Barshi Taluka Police Station, present.
-------
CORAM
: ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE
: 14th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Jaydeep Mane, learned Advocate for the Applicants and Mr. S. S. Chudhary, learned A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2- State
2. By the present Application, the Applicants have sought the following substantial relief: “b. The applicants may be released on bail for the offences U/s. 118(1), 115(2), 351(2), 352, 189(2), 191(2), 190, 109, 119(1) of BNS and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. Registered at C.R. No.49 / 2026 of Barshi Taluka Police Station such terms and condition which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper.”
3. At the outset, Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, learned A.P.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2–State, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, submits that the investigation in Crime No. 49 of 2026, registered at the Barshi Taluka Police Station, Solapur Rural, is complete and that the Investigating Officer has filed the charge-sheet before the jurisdictional Court.
4. Based on the statement made by Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, learned A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State, Mr. Jaydeep Mane, learned Advocate for the Applicants, on instructions from the Applicants (Accused No.2 and Accused No.5), seeks leave to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court in view of the subsequent event, as stated by Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, learned A.P.P., i.e. the filing of the charge-sheet.
5. The request made by Mr. Jaydeep Mane, learned Advocate for the Applicants, is not opposed by Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, learned A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State.
6. In view of the statement made by Mr. Jaydeep Mane, learned Advocate for the Applicants, leave is granted to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court.
7. If a fresh Bail Application is filed before the Trial Court, same be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.
8. Criminal Bail Application No.959 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn. ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)