Bombay High Court
BA/295/2026 of SHAINATH PARUJI GHOLAP Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 13 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 295 OF 2026 Shainath Paruji Gholap ….Applicant Versus State Of Maharashtra And Others ….Respondents ---- Mr. Amit Sale i/b Mr. Sameer S. Kadam, for Applicant. Mr. S.
66-BA-295-2026(CR).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 295 OF 2026
Shainath Paruji Gholap
….Applicant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra And Others
….Respondents
----
Mr. Amit Sale i/b Mr. Sameer S. Kadam, for Applicant.
Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, APP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State.
Mr. Shailesh Chavan a/w Mr. Sumit Vhanbatte, Mr. Sujit Nikam, and Ms.
Swarali B. Chougule, for Respondent No.3.
-------
CORAM
: ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE
: 13th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard, Mr. Amit Sale, learned Advocate for the Applicant, Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, learned A.P.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 – State and Mr. Shailesh Chavan, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 3.
2. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought the following substantial relief: “a). this Hon’ble Court be pleased to release the Applicant on bail in connection with C.R.No.750 of 2025 registered with Satara City Police Station, Satara for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 352, 351(2) of the Shantanu S. Dhudum
66-BA-295-2026(CR).DOC Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, and Sections 3 and 4 of the M.P.I.D. Act, on such terms and conditions as this Hon’ble Court deem fit and proper.”
3. At the outset, Mr. Amit Sale, learned Advocate for the Applicant, submits that, due to inadvertence, the antecedents of the Applicant remained to be disclosed in the Affidavit of disclosure dated 31st March 2026, filed by the Applicant. He admits the mistake on the part of the Applicant and seeks leave to withdraw this Bail Application, with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application before this Court. This request is not opposed by Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, learned A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State and Mr. Shailesh Chavan, learned Advocate for Respondent No.3.
4. In view of the no objection, leave to withdraw this Bail Application is granted with liberty, as prayed.
5. The Criminal Bail Application No.295 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum