Bombay High Court
CP/88/2026 of Suresh Babu Biranage Vs The State of Maharashtra and Ors on 13 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 87 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 6369 OF 2019 Amit Ashok Anande and others ] Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra and others ] Respondents WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 88 OF
12-CP-87-2026 (C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 87 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 6369 OF 2019
Amit Ashok Anande and others
]
Petitioners
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
]
Respondents
WITH
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 88 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 11155 OF 2018
Suresh Babu Biranage ]
Petitioner
versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
]
Respondents
.....
Mr. Sagar A Mane, Advocate for Petitioners.
Mr. P.P. Kakade, Addl. G.P. a/w Mr. Atul P. Vanarase, A.G.P, for Respondent – State.
Mr. Akshay Shinde, Advocate for Respondent Nos.4 and 5.
.....
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
ABHAY J. MANTRI, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 13, 2026.
P. C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By the present Petitions, contempt is alleged of the order dated 20th February, 2019 by which this Court had directed that in the event salary bills of the Petitioners are held back, order of status quo does not mean that such salary bills should not be forwarded and if Shailaja 1 of
12-CP-87-2026 (C).doc forwarded, should be processed in accordance with law. The grievance of the Petitioners was that though the salary bills have been forwarded, the same have not been cleared.
2. Learned A.G.P tenders the Aidavit-in-Reply of the Education Oicer annexing the Bank statements of the Petitioners showing the disbursement of the amount.
3. In so far as Contempt Petition No.88 of 2026 is concerned, though the bank statements are not placed on record, Mr. Mane, learned Advocate for the Petitioner, on instructions of the legal heirs of the Petitioner, submits that salary bills have been processed and amounts have been disbursed.
4. As there is compliance of the order, the Contempt Petitions stand disposed of. [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.] [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] Shailaja 2 of