Bombay High Court
CRA/594/2023 of SANJAY SHIVAJIRAO POWAR AND ORS Vs SHEFALI KARTIK MEHTA on 13 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 594 OF 2023 Sanjay Shivajirao Powar And Ors. … Applicants Versus Shefali Kartik Mehta And Anr. … Respondents
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 594 OF 2023
Sanjay Shivajirao Powar And Ors.
… Applicants
Versus
Shefali Kartik Mehta And Anr.
… Respondents
_______________________________________________________________
Mr. Shrikrishna Ganbavale a/w Ashirwad Kolekar, Shantanu Patil, Sakshi Patil, Shruti Jadhav i/b Kush Lahankar, Advocate for the Applicants.
Mr. Rajesh Shaha a/w N. D. Tiwari, C. R. Shaha and R. S. Rajput, Advocate for the Respondent.
Mr. Umesh Pawar, for the Respondent No. 2.
_______________________________________________________________
CORAM :
ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE : 13th October, 2026.
P.C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Shrikrishna Ganbavale, learned Advocate for the Applicants, Mr. Rajesh Shaha, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 and Mr. Umesh Pawar, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 2.
2. By the present Application, the Applicants (Original Defendant Nos. 2 to 5), have sought for the following substantive relief in prayer clause 9(b) :- (b) This Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside Order dated 04/07/2023, passed below Exh. 25, by the Ld. Civil Judge Senior Division, Kolhapur, in the Regular Civil Suit No. 473 of 2023;
3. Mr. Shrikrishna Ganbavale, learned Advocate for the Applicants, on instructions from the Applicants, seeks leave to withdraw this Arjun
Application with liberty to file appropriate Application before the Trial Court in Regular Civil Suit No. 473 of 2023, seeking dismissal of the Suit, as may be available in terms of law. He submits that if such an Application is filed, same be considered by the Trial Court on its own merits.
4. The request made by Mr. Shrikrishna Ganbavale, learned Advocate for the Applicants, is not opposed by Mr. Rajesh Shaha, learned Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 (Plaintiff). He however submits that all the contentions of the Respondent No. 1 (Plaintiff) as available in terms of law be left open to be adjudicated by the Trial Court, in the event the Applicants choose to file any Application in Regular Civil Suit No. 473 of 2023.
5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Shrikrishna Ganbavale, learned Advocate for the Applicants, leave is granted to withdraw the present Application with liberty as prayed.
6. If any Application is filed by the Applicants before the Trial Court in Regular Civil Suit No. 473 of 2023, same be considered on its merits and in accordance with law.
7. All the contentions of the parties in Regular Civil Suit No. 473 of Arjun
2023, are expressly left open.
8. Civil Revision Application No. 594 of 2023 is disposed of as withdrawn.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Arjun