Bombay High Court

ABA/556/2026 of AKASH TANAJI JAGTAP AND ANR. Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. on 13 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 556 OF 2026 Akash Tanaji Jagtap And Anr. ….Applicants VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ….Respondents

59-ABA-556-2026(CR).DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 556 OF 2026

Akash Tanaji Jagtap And Anr.

….Applicants

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Anr.

….Respondents

_________________________________________________________________

Mr. Vikrant V. Phatate for Applicants.

Mr. C. D. Mali, A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State.

Mr. Sujit B. Nikam a/w Mr. Tushar Rokde and Mr. Omkar Koratkar, for Respondent No.3.

_________________________________________________________________

CORAM

: ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE

: 13th OCTOBER, 2026.

P.C.

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Mr. Vikrant V. Phatate, learned Advocate for the Applicants, Mr. C. D. Mali, learned A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State and Mr. Sujit B. Nikam, learned Advocate for Respondent No.3.

2. By the present Application, the Applicants have sought the following substantial relief: “b) this Hon’ble Court be pleased to release the Applicants in the event of his arrest in the connection with the F.I.R. bearing C.R. No.724 of 2026 registered with Mangalwedha Police Station, District Solapur.” Shantanu S. Dhudum

59-ABA-556-2026(CR).DOC

3. Mr. Vikrant V. Phatate, learned Advocate for the Applicants, on instructions from the Applicants, seeks leave to unconditionally withdraw the present Anticipatory Bail Application.

4. This request is not opposed by Mr. C. D. Mali, learned A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 - State.

5. In view of the statement made by Mr. Vikrant V. Phatate, learned Advocate for the Applicants, leave is granted to withdraw this Application.

6. Criminal Anticipatory Bail Application No.556 of 2026 is dismissed as withdrawn. ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead