Bombay High Court
IA/906/2026 of Pushpanjali Mahesh Shinde Vs Mahesh Manik Shinde on 13 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 906 OF 2026 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 369 OF 2025 Pushpanjali Mahesh Shinde … Applicant Versus Mahesh Manik Shinde … Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 906 OF 2026
IN
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 369 OF 2025
Pushpanjali Mahesh Shinde
… Applicant
Versus
Mahesh Manik Shinde
… Respondent
——————
Ms. Gayatri Kulkarni h/f. Ms. Vrushali Maindad for the Applicant.
Ms. Pratiksha Chaugule i/b. Mr. Vaibhav Gaikwad for the Respondent.
——————
Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
Date : 13th October 2026.
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This Application is circulated pursuant to the praecipe dated 13th October 2026. In view of the urgency expressed by Ms. Gayatri Kulkarni, learned Advocate for the Applicant, this Application was directed to be placed on the production list.
2. Heard Ms. Gayatri Kulkarni, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. Pratiksha Chaugule, learned Advocate for the Respondent. osk 1 of
3. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought the following reliefs : The Hon’ble Court be pleased to allow this Interim Application and grant leave to amend Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 369 of 2025 as per the ‘Schedule of proposed amendment’.
4. Ms. Gayatri Kulkarni, learned Advocate for the Applicant, submits that all objections of the Respondent on the merits of the proposed amendment may be kept open.
5. Ms. Pratiksha Chaugule, learned Advocate for the Respondent, objects to the amendment proposed by the Applicant. She submits that the Application has been filed with mala fide intentions to cause harassment and prejudice to the Respondent. She, therefore, opposes the reliefs sought in the Application.
6. Perusal of the ‘Schedule of proposed amendment’ indicates that the same pertains to the subsequent event of transfer of the Hindu Marriage Petition and renumbering of the same.
7. In view of the same, this Interim Application is allowed. The Applicant is permitted to carry out the amendment in terms of (a), (b) and (c) of the ‘Schedule of proposed amendment’, at page Nos.10 and 11 of the Application. osk 2 of
8. All contentions of the Respondent on the merits of the said amendment are kept open to be considered while adjudicating Miscellaneous Civil Application No. 369 of 2025.
9. The amended copy of the Application shall be served on the Respondent within one week from today.
10. The Interim Application No. 906 of 2026 is disposed of. [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] osk 3 of