Bombay High Court
BA/951/2026 of VITTHAL ALIAS OMKAR PANDURANG ADEKAR Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 13 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 951 OF 2026 Vitthal @ Omkar Pandurang Adekar …...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. …...Respondents
7-BA-951-2026 (CR).docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLN. NO. 951 OF 2026
Vitthal @ Omkar Pandurang Adekar
…...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
…...Respondents
——————
Ms. Pallavi Kante (Through V.C.) a/w. Mr. Muralidhar Kharat for Applicant.
Mr. S.H. Yadav, A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State.
Officer : API Mr. Sunil Gidde, Sanjaynagar Police Station, present.
——————
Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
Date : 13th October 2026.
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard, Ms. Pallavi Kante, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. Yadav, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State.
2. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought the following substantive reliefs : “This Hon’ble High Court may kindly be pleased to release the present applicant on bail in connection with C.R. no. 302/2026 registered at Sanjaynagar Police Station.” osk 1 of
7-BA-951-2026 (CR).docx
3. Mr. Yadav, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State, submits that the investigation in Crime No. 302 of 2026, registered at Sanjaynagar Police Station, District Sangli, is complete and that the charge-sheet was filed on 12th October 2026 before the Court having jurisdiction.
4. In view of the aforesaid subsequent development, Ms. Pallavi Kante, learned Advocate for the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Bail Application, with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court. The request is not opposed by Mr. Yadav, learned A.P.P. for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2-State.
5. In view of the statement made by Ms. Pallavi Kante, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty as prayed for.
6. If a fresh Bail Application is filed before the Trial Court, the same be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.
7. The Cri. Bail Application No. 951 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] osk 2 of