Bombay High Court

CRA/118/2026 of SHAM CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD THR. CHAIRMAN SUNITA C. PATIL Vs VAISHNAVI VIJAY SANKPAL AND ORS on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 118 OF 2026 Sham Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd Thr. Chairman Sunita C. Patil ...Applicant Versus Vaishnavi Vijay Sankpal and Ors. ...Respondents

19-CRA118-2026.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 118 OF 2026

Sham Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd

Thr. Chairman Sunita C. Patil

...Applicant

Versus

Vaishnavi Vijay Sankpal and Ors.

...Respondents

_______________________________________________________________

Mr. Rohan Patil, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. Yuvaraj Gharal a/w Vishal Sarnaik, Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 and 2.

_______________________________________________________________

CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

12th October, 2026.

P.C. :

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. By the present Civil Revision Application, the Applicant has sought the following substantive relief in terms of prayer clause (a):- (a) Rule be issued, record and proceedings be called for and after examining legality and validity thereof, this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside order dated 13/08/2026 passed by Ld. Civil Judge Senior Division, Kolhapur on application at Ex. 26 in Regular Civil Suit No. 406 of 2026 being “Exhibit-E” to this Civil Revision Application, be quashed and set aside;

2. Mr. Rohan Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Application with liberty to raise all the objections on maintainability as well as on merits of the Regular Civil Suit No. 406 of 2026, before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Kolhapur during the trial of the Regular Arjun

19-CRA118-2026.doc Civil Suit No. 406 of 2026.

3. The request made by Mr. Rohan Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, is not opposed by Mr. Yuvaraj Gharal, learned Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, who in fact submits that all the contentions in this Civil Revision Application will have to be considered on merits of the Regular Civil Suit No. 406 of 2026.

4. In view of the statements made by Mr. Rohan Patil, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Application with liberty as prayed.

5. All contentions of the parties are expressly left open to be adjudicated during the trial of Regular Civil Suit No. 406 of 2026.

6. Civil Revision Application No. 118 of 2026 is disposed of. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Arjun

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead