Bombay High Court
IA/338/2026 of VIDYADHAR BHUPAL MANGAVE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 12 October 2026
- 338 - 2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 338 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3379 OF 2023 Vidyadhar Bhupal Mangave … Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
109 - CRI IA - 338 - 2026.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 338 OF 2026
IN
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3379 OF 2023
Vidyadhar Bhupal Mangave
…
Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
…
Respondents
Mr. Saurabh Tandale for the Applicant.
Dr. A. A. Takalkar, APP for the State.
Mr. Mohan Chavan for Respondent No.2.
CORAM
: ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATED
: OCTOBER 12, 2026
P.C.:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By the present Application, the Applicant has sought the following substantive reliefs: “A. This Application for Cancellation of Bail may kindly be allowed; B. Cancel the bail granted to Respondent No.1/Accused in Bail Application No. 3379 of 2023 in connection with C.R. No. 589 of 2022 registered with Sangli Police Station kindly be directed to the surrender before the investigation authority and for that purpose issue necessary orders; C. This Hon’ble court kindly Direct the Investigating Officer / Concerned Police Station to take Respondent No.2 into custody forthwith upon cancellation of bail;”
2. Mr. Saurabh Tandale, learned Advocate for the Applicant, states that during the pendency of this Interim Application, a non-bailable warrant was issued against the Respondent No.2 and the Respondent VRJ
109 - CRI IA - 338 - 2026.docx No.2 has been arrested. He, therefore, submits that the reliefs sought in this Application have become infructuous and that this Application be disposed of.
3. Dr. A. A. Takalkar, learned APP for the State, endorses the submission made by Mr. Saurabh Tandale, learned Advocate for the Applicant, and submits that this Application is rendered infructuous.
4. Mr. Mohan Chavan, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2, states that Respondent No. 2 has been arrested upon execution of the non-bailable warrant issued by this Court.
5. In view of the aforesaid statements and the fact that Respondent No. 2 has been arrested during the pendency of this Interim Application, this Application is disposed of as infructuous.
6. Criminal Interim Application No. 338 of 2026 stands disposed of.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) VRJ