Bombay High Court
MCA/60/2026 of Mrs Tejashri Abhijit Patil Vs Mr Abhijit Bapusaheb Patil on 9 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 60 OF 2026 Mrs Tejashri Abhijit Patil … Applicant Versus Mr Abhijit Bapusaheb Patil … Respondent —————— Mr. Umakant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 60 OF 2026
Mrs Tejashri Abhijit Patil
… Applicant
Versus
Mr Abhijit Bapusaheb Patil
… Respondent
——————
Mr. Umakant Waghmare for the Applicant.
Ms. Vaishnavi Gaikwad for the Respondent.
——————
Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
Date : 9th October 2026.
PER COURT :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Heard Mr. Umakant Waghmare, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. Vaishnavi Gaikwad, learned Advocate for the Respondent.
2. By the present Application filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the Applicant-wife has sought the following substantive relief : “(b) Transfer Petition No. A/60 of 2025, filed by the Respondent under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and presently pending before the Learned Judge, Family Court, Sangli, to the file osk 1 of of the Learned Judge, Family Court, Kolhapur, in exercise of powers under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.”
3. Ms. Vaishnavi Gaikwad, learned Advocate for the Respondent, states that the distance between Kolhapur and Sangli is approximately 45 kilometres. She states that Marriage Petition No. A-60 of 2025, filed by the Respondent against the Applicant, is pending before the Court at Sangli. She further submits that Darkhast Petition No. 23 of 2025, filed by the Applicant against the Respondent, is also pending before the Court at Sangli.
4. Ms. Vaishnavi Gaikwad, learned Advocate for the Respondent, states that the Respondent is ready and willing to pay conveyance charges to the Applicant for travelling to Sangli to attend the proceedings in Marriage Petition No. A-60 of 2025. She states that the Respondent shall pay Rs. 1,000/- per date of hearing to the Applicant. She states that the statement is made on specific instructions from the Respondent. She states that the said statement be accepted as a statement to the Court.
5. The statement made by Ms. Vaishnavi Gaikwad, learned Advocate for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, is accepted as an undertaking given by the Respondent to this Court. osk 2 of
6. In view of the above, the following order is passed:
(a) The Respondent shall pay an amount of Rs. 1,000/- to the Respondent for attending each date of hearing fixed by the Family Court, Sangli, in Marriage Petition No. A-60 of 2025, as conveyance expenses.
(b) The Respondent shall deposit an amount of Rs. 1,000/- for each date of hearing, on the date fixed for hearing by the Family Court, Sangli, in the Registry of the Family Court at Sangli. Respondent shall be entitled to withdraw the said amount.
7. In view of the fair statement made by Ms. Vaishnavi Gaikwad, learned Advocate for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, Mr. Umakant Waghmare, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw this Application.
8. The Misc. Civil Application No. 60 of 2026 is disposed of in the above terms. [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] osk 3 of