Bombay High Court
WP/337/2024 of ARUN VITTHAL PAUDMAL Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. on 8 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 337 OF 2024 Arun Vitthal Paudmal ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents —————— Ms. Vaishnavi R. Gaikwad i/b. Mr. Chaitanya S.
71-WP-337-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 337 OF 2024
Arun Vitthal Paudmal
...Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra and Others
...Respondents
——————
Ms. Vaishnavi R. Gaikwad i/b. Mr. Chaitanya S. Kulkarni for the Petitioner.
Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP, for the Respondents-State.
Mr. Vikram N. Walawalkar (Through VC) with Ms. Siddheshwari R. Chavan, for the Respondent Nos.4 & 5.
Mr. Abhijit M. Adagule, for the Respondent No.6.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
Date : October 08, 2026.
P. C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Mentioned out of turn.
2. The learned counsel appearing for Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
3. At the request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Gaikwad RD 1 of
1