Bombay High Court
WP/369/2026 of RAMESH PANDURANG KADAM Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS on 8 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 369 OF 2026 Ramesh Pandurang Kadam ...Petitioner Versus State Of Maharashtra And Others ...Respondents —————— Advocate Tejas Patil i/b Advocate Ishaan Kapse
98-WP-369-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 369 OF 2026
Ramesh Pandurang Kadam
...Petitioner
Versus
State Of Maharashtra And Others
...Respondents
——————
Advocate Tejas Patil i/b Advocate Ishaan Kapse for the Petitioner Mr. P. P. Kakade – Addl. GP a/w Mr. V. G. Badgujar – AGP for the State ——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
Date : October 08, 2026.
P. C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioner submits that the Petition has been rendered infructuous.
2. In view of the submission of the learned Advocate for the Petitioner, the Petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] SG Punde 1 of
1