Bombay High Court

WP/1035/2026 of ARUN BALKU YADAV AND ANR Vs JAISINGH BAPU SHINDE AND ORS on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1035 OF 2026 Arun Balku Yadav and Anr. … Petitioners Vs. Jaisingh Bapu Shinde and Ors. … Respondents …………. Mr. Amarsinh Bhosale a /w Akshay Pujari for

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

67-WP-1035-2026=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1035 OF 2026 Arun Balku Yadav and Anr. … Petitioners Vs. Jaisingh Bapu Shinde and Ors. … Respondents …………. Mr. Amarsinh Bhosale a/w Akshay Pujari for the Petitioners Mr. Sanjay D. Rayrikar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 - State …………. CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 8th OCTOBER, 2026. P. C. : . Heard.

2. The petitioners - original plaintiffs are challenging the order dated 09.09.2025 rejecting appointment of Court Commissioner. The application Exh.43, upon which impugned order is passed, was preferred at pretrial stage.

3. In view of consistent view being taken by this Court in the case of Sitaram Sukhlak Patil vs. Vasudev Sukhlal Patil in Writ Petition No. 9626 of 2016, decided on 31.07.2017 and Sarjerao Nathu Bangar & Ors. vs. Namdeo Keru Bangar & Ors. in Writ Petition No. 13441 of 2019, decided on 07.11.2019, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition with liberty to file application afresh after the evidence is over. Uday S. Jagtap 1 of

67-WP-1035-2026=.doc

4. The Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with a liberty to prefer the application afresh if so required under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC at the appropriate stage of the proceedings.

5. If such application is filed, the same shall be dealt with in accordance with law and without being influenced by any earlier orders passed in the matter, especially the impugned order. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ) Uday S. Jagtap 2 of

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead