Bombay High Court
WP/355/2026 of VITTHAL VASUDEV YADAV Vs CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD SINDHUDURGA AND ORS. on 8 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 355 OF 2026 Vitthal Vasudev Yadav ...Petitioner Versus Chief Executive Oicer Zilla Parishad Sindhudurga and others ...Respondents —————— Mr. Mahesh Vijay
97-WP-355-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 355 OF 2026
Vitthal Vasudev Yadav
...Petitioner
Versus
Chief Executive Oicer Zilla Parishad
Sindhudurga and others
...Respondents
——————
Mr. Mahesh Vijay Rawool a/w Mr. Neeraj Lavte - Advocate for the Petitioner.
Miss Tejas J. Kapre – AGP for the State
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
Date : October 08, 2026.
P. C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the outset, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner seeks leave to amend the Petition so as to incorporate an additional prayer seeking adjudication of the Revision Application pending with Respondent No. 4 since 2024.
2. Leave is granted. The amendment to be carried out forthwith.
3. The limited grievance is that Respondent No. 4 be directed to decide the Revision Application iled by the Petitioner expeditiously, as the same has been pending since 2024. SG Punde 1 of
97-WP-355-2026.doc
4. In view of the limited grievance, the Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No. 4 to decide the Revision Application iled by the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] SG Punde 2 of