Bombay High Court
CP/216/2026 of Baby Jalindar Awate alias Kiran Shrikrushana Dahihande Vs Om Prakash Gupata And Ors. on 8 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 216 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 16429 OF 2024 Baby Jalindar Awate @ Kiran Shrikrushana Dahihande ...Petitioner Versus Om Prakash Gupata And Others ...Respondents
30-CP-216-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 216 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 16429 OF 2024
Baby Jalindar Awate @ Kiran Shrikrushana Dahihande ...Petitioner
Versus
Om Prakash Gupata And Others
...Respondents
——————
Mr. Ratan Adhe a/w Adv. A.R.Barad, for the Petitioner.
Mr. R.P.Kadam, “B” Panel counsel a/w Mr. V.G.Badgujar, AGP for the Respondent-State.
——————
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
DATE : OCTOBER 08, 2026.
P. C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By the present Petition, contempt is alleged of the order dated 9th December, 2025 by which Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 were issued directions to decide the representation and the proposal for pay fixation within a period of six weeks. Though, the order was passed on 9th December, 2025, till date representations have not been decided.
2. Learned counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 would submit that within a period of two weeks representation will be decided.
3. The said statement is accepted as undertaking given to this Court. It is expected that within a period of two weeks, the order dated 9th Arya Chavan 1 of
2026:BHC-KOL:9789-DB
30-CP-216-2026.doc December, 2025 would be complied and there would be no aggravated contempt.
4. The Contempt Petition is disposed of in light of the said statement. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] Arya Chavan 2 of