Bombay High Court

WP/3867/2026 of SOURABH SANDIP KHOT THR. GUARDIAN FATHER SANDIP POPAT KHOT Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. EDUCAITON OF DEPT. AND ORS. on 8 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3867 OF 2026 Sourabh Sandip Khot Through Guardian father Sandip Popat Khot ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...Respondents —————— Mr.

904-WP-3867-2026.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO. 3867 OF 2026

Sourabh Sandip Khot

Through Guardian father Sandip Popat Khot

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Others

...Respondents

——————

Mr. Nikhil N. Pawar with Ms. Manasi Patil, for the Petitioner.

Ms. Tejas J. Kapre, AGP for the Respondents-State.

——————

Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh &

Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.

Date : October 08, 2026.

P. C. :

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. The learned AGP would submit that the application has been wrongly made to the Headmaster of the school, who does not have any authority, to correct the date of birth and the application is required to be made to the Education Oicer alongwith supporting documents so that the decision can be taken by the Education Oicer and in the event that the correction is sought in the S.S.C. Mark-sheet, then the application has to be made to Secondary and Higher Secondary Board.

2. In the present case, the Petitioner has iled an application with the Headmaster, who has stated that the Headmaster of the school has no authority to make the necessary correction. The learned counsel for Gaikwad RD 1 of

904-WP-3867-2026.doc the Petitioner, in light of the submissions, made by learned AGP, would submit that within a period of two weeks from today, the application for correction of date of birth in school record will be made to the Education Oicer and for correction of the mark-sheet, the application will be made after the Education Oicer corrects the date of birth, to Secondary and Higher Secondary Board.

3. In the event, if such an application is made, the Education Oicer is directed to decide the same expeditiously and in any event within a period of four weeks from the date of application.

4. Needless to clarify that the application to be accompanied by all supporting documents.

5. The Petition is disposed of accordingly. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Gaikwad RD 2 of

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead