Bombay High Court
IA/634/2026 of PRABHAKAR VITHOBA DHANE Vs The Superintendent of Police on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.634 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.907 OF 2026 Prabhakar Vithoba Dhane ….Intervenor IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Hanmant Tanaji Suryawanshi ….Applicant VERSUS The
503-IA-634-2026(CR).DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.634 OF 2026
IN
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.907 OF 2026
Prabhakar Vithoba Dhane
….Intervenor
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Hanmant Tanaji Suryawanshi
….Applicant
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
....Respondents
_________________________________________________________________
Mr. Kuldeep U. Nikam, for the Intervenor.
Mr. Sampatrao H. Pawar a/w Dr. Shrikant M. Kulkarni, Mr. Kaustubh R.
Dhongade and Mr. Pankaj S. Dhanavade, for the Applicant.
Mr. C. D. Mali, A.P.P. for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State.
PSI, Mr. Vikas More, Kadegaon Police Station, Sangli, present.
_________________________________________________________________
CORAM
: ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE
: 7th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By the present Interim Application, the Intervenor (Original Complainant) seeks intervention in Bail Application No.907 of 2026.
2. Mr. Sampatrao H. Pawar, learned Advocate for the Applicant in Bail Application No.907 of 2026, in all fairness, states that the Applicant Shantanu S. Dhudum
503-IA-634-2026(CR).DOC has no objection to permitting the Intervenor to intervene in Bail Application No.907 of 2026.
3. Mr. C. D. Mali, learned A.P.P., for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – State, does not oppose the request made in this Application.
4. In view of the no objection, the Intervenor is permitted to intervene as an “Intervenor” in Bail Application No.907 of 2026.
5. Mr. Sampatrao H. Pawar, learned Advocate for the Applicant seeks permission to carry out amendment to add the Intervenor as an “Intervenor” in Bail Application No.907 of 2026. Permission is granted. Amendment be carried out.
6. Criminal Interim Application No.634 of 2026 is disposed of. ( ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum