Bombay High Court
ABA/594/2026 of RAMESH KALLAPPA CHOUGULE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR on 7 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 594 OF 2026 Ramesh Kallappa Chougule ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra And Anr. ...Respondents
904-ABA-594-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 594 OF 2026
Ramesh Kallappa Chougule
...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr.
...Respondents
_______________________________________________________________
Mr. Pratik Tare i/b S. Y. Mane, Advocate for the Applicant.
Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for the Respondent – State.
PSI Vishal Yelekar, Hatkanangale Police Station, is present.
_______________________________________________________________
CORAM :
ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE :
7th October, 2026.
P.C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By the present Application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Applicant is seeking pre- arrest bail in connection with C.R. No. 361 of 2026, registered with Hatkanangale Police Station, District Solapur.
2. Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicant, at the outset, submits that due to inadvertence, the antecedents of the Applicant remained to be disclosed in the Affidavit. He therefore seeks leave to withdraw the present Application with liberty to file a fresh Anticipatory Bail Application by complying with the requirements of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Zeba Khan v. State Arjun
904-ABA-594-2026.doc of U.P.1.
3. The request made by Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicant, is not opposed by Mr. N. B. Patil, learned APP for the Respondent – State.
4. In view of the statement made by Mr. Pratik Tare, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Application with liberty as prayed.
5. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 594 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)
2026 SCC OnLine SC 188 Arjun