Bombay High Court
WP/1333/2026 of ABDULJABBAR ABDULSATTAR BARASKAR AND ORS Vs MUSLIM EDUCATION COMITTEE THR. ITS PRESIDENT AND ORS on 7 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1333 OF 2026 Abduljabbar Abdulsattar Baraskar And Others ...Petitioners Versus Muslim Education Comittee Thr. Its President And Others ...Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 3834
109-WP-1333-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1333 OF 2026
Abduljabbar Abdulsattar Baraskar And Others
...Petitioners
Versus
Muslim Education Comittee Thr. Its President And Others
...Respondents
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 3834 OF 2026
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 1333 OF 2026
Muslim Education Comittee Thr. Its Secretary And Others
...Applicants
Versus
Abduljabbar Abdulsattar Baraskar And Others
...Respondents
——————
Mr. P. D. Dalvi a/w Tejas Shelake & Sonal Nalawade for the Petitioner.
Mr. Atul P. Vanarase, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Mr. Akshay Kulkarni (Through V. C.) for the Applicant in IA.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
Date : October 07, 2026.
P. C. :
[i]
ORDER IN INTERIM APPLICATION (STAMP) NO. 3834 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Application has been preferred seeking intervention in the present proceedings by the Muslim Education Committee. Harish 1 of
109-WP-1333-2026.doc
2. For the reasons stated, the application is allowed.
3. The interim application is disposed of accordingly. [ii] ORDER IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1333 OF 2026
1. The limited relief in the writ petition is for a direction to the Assistant Charity Commissioner, Sangli to decide their applications, which are pending with the Assistant Charity Commissioner since the year 2025, seeking to be enrolled as members of the respondent No. 1 Trust.
2. The intervenor opposes the said applications.
3. As the petitioners are only seeking a direction to adjudicate their applications, the petition can be disposed of by directing the Assistant Charity Commissioner to decide their applications expeditiously. The intervenor in the present petition is at liberty to appear before the Assistant Charity Commissioner and raise all objections. All contentions of all the parties are expressly kept open.
4. Learned AGP submits, on instructions, that the entire record has been sent to the Waqf Board. In such event, it is open for the Assistant Charity Commissioner to pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.
5. The petition is disposed of in the above term. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Harish 2 of