Bombay High Court
WP/11268/2025 of AKASH UTTAM KANDALE Vs SOLAPUR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THR. ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER AND ORS. on 6 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 11268 OF 2025 Akash Uttam Kandale ...Petitioner Versus Solapur Municipal Corporation Thr. Its Municipal Commissioner And Others ...Respondents —————— Mr.
908-WP-11268-2025.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11268 OF 2025
Akash Uttam Kandale
...Petitioner
Versus
Solapur Municipal Corporation Thr. Its Municipal Commissioner And Others
...Respondents
——————
Mr. Pradeep Salgar, for the Petitioner.
Mr. R.S.Alange, for the Respondent No. 1.
Mr. Prasad Kulkarni, for the Respondent No. 4.
Ms. Tejas Kapre, AGP for the Respondent-State.
——————
Coram : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH &
NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ.
Date : OCTOBER 06, 2026
P. C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By the present Petition, the challenge is to the tender floated on 17th April, 2025. There are no interim orders passed in the present Petition and considering that the tender was floated in the year 2025, the same would have been taken to its logical end. The tender was for laying of drainage line.
2. Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 4, who is the successful bidder submits that the entire work is completed. In view thereof, the Petition stands disposed of, as nothing survives for consideration.
3. Applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and stand disposed of. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] Arya Chavan 1 of
1 2026:BHC-KOL:9627-DB