Bombay High Court
WP/4108/2026 of SUNITA TIPANNA MALI AND ORS. Vs AAMSIDDHA APPARAYA MALI AND ORS. 131 on 6 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4108 OF 2026 Sunita Tipanna Mali And Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Aamsiddha Apparaya Mali And Ors. 131 ...Respondents ….. Adv. Shashank Mangle (through V.C.) a /w Adv. Prajakta
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
94-WP-4108-2026 (C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4108 OF 2026 Sunita Tipanna Mali And Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Aamsiddha Apparaya Mali And Ors. 131 ...Respondents ….. Adv. Shashank Mangle (through V.C.) a/w Adv. Prajakta Kamble, Advocate for Petitioners. Mr. Sanjay D. Rayrikar, AGP for the Respondents-State. …..
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 06th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C. : Both the counsel are ad idem that the learned Additional Tehsildar, Sankh, has finally decided the matter vide order dated 30.09.2026, by way of interim direction. It was expressly stated that the Additional Tehsildar was not precluded from deciding the matter. Hence, the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as become infructuous.
3. It would be open for the parties to agitate their grievance against the decision, as is permissible in law. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] ZIP 1 of 1