Bombay High Court
IA/213/2026 of INDUBAI SARJERAO MUNDE Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 6 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 213 OF 2026 IN CR. APPEAL NO. 898 OF 2025 Indubai Sarjerao Munde ...Applicant In the matter between Mahadev Bajirao Munde ...Appellant Versus State Of Maharashtra ...Respondent
10-IA-213-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 213 OF 2026
IN
CR. APPEAL NO. 898 OF 2025
Indubai Sarjerao Munde
...Applicant
In the matter between
Mahadev Bajirao Munde
...Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra
...Respondent
——————
Mr. Paras Yadav for the Applicant.
Mr. P. P. Deokar, APP for the Respondent No. 1-State.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
Date : October 06, 2026.
P. C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. This is an Application by the Informant for early hearing of the Criminal Appeal preferred by the Appellant against his conviction.
2. The learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant is one of the victims examined before the learned Trial Court and wants the Appeal to be heard expeditiously.
3. The learned APP submits that no such provision is there under the law for an application to be made by the Informant. Harish 1 of
10-IA-213-2026.doc
4. The Appeal preferred by the Appellant is admitted. The Appellant is on bail.
5. In view of the above, the Application stands dismissed. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Harish 2 of