Bombay High Court
WP/4496/2026 of SHRIPAL GANGAPPA CHOUGALE Vs PADMANNA DEVEDNDRA UPADHYE DECEASED THR. LRS. KANCHANMALA PADMANNA UPADHYE AND ORS. on 6 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4496 OF 2026 Shripal Gangappa Chougale ...Petitioner Versus Padmanna Devedndra Upadhye Deceased Thr. Lrs. Kanchanmala Padmanna Upadhye And Ors. ...Respondents ….. Adv. Manoj A
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
36-WP-4496-2026 (C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4496 OF 2026 Shripal Gangappa Chougale ...Petitioner Versus Padmanna Devedndra Upadhye Deceased Thr. Lrs. Kanchanmala Padmanna Upadhye And Ors. ...Respondents ….. Adv. Manoj A. Patil a/w Adv. Ankita D. Mali i/b Adv. Shubham R. Dhenge, Advocate for Petitioner. …..
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 06th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C. : Though the matter is in await service category, learned counsel, Mr. Manoj Patil appearing for the petitioner informs this Court that his client has already filed proceedings under Order XXI Rule 97 / 99 of Code of Civil Procedure before the Executing Court and wants to prosecute the same.
2. In view of the supervening event, there is no need to entertain the writ petition any further.
3. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction that the application filed under Order XXI Rule 97 / 99 of CPC shall be dealt ZIP
36-WP-4496-2026 (C).doc with on its own merits and/or, if any application for interim protection is filed, that also be dealt with accordingly.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] ZIP