Bombay High Court
BA/367/2026 of ANIKET VITTHAL KADAM Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. on 6 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 367 OF 2026 Aniket Vitthal Kadam ...Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra And Anr. ...Respondents _______________________________________________________________
23-BA-367-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 367 OF 2026
Aniket Vitthal Kadam
...Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra And Anr.
...Respondents
_______________________________________________________________
Mr. Kuldeep Nikam, Advocate for the Applicant (through VC)
Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the Respondent – State.
Mr. N. T. Garale, Kavathemahankal Police Station, is present.
_______________________________________________________________
CORAM :
ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
DATE :
6th October, 2026.
P.C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. By the present Application, the Applicant is seeking bail in connection with C. R. No. 410 of 2025, registered with Kavathemahankal Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 118(1), 126(2), 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Kuldeep Nikam, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to approach the Trial Court with a fresh Bail Application after a period of 9 months from today, in the event there is no substantial progress in the trial. Arjun
23-BA-367-2026.doc
3. Mr. S. H. Yadav, learned APP for the Respondent - State, submits that charge is framed on 08.04.2026 and the prosecution would commence the trial by examining the Informant and the main eyewitnesses. He states that he has no objection to grant the request made by Mr. Kuldeep Nikam, learned Advocate for the Applicant.
4. In view of the statements made by Mr. Kuldeep Nikam, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. S. H. Yadav, learned APP, leave is granted to withdraw the present Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court, after a period of 9 months from today, in the event there is no substantial progress in the trial of Sessions Case No. 18 of 2026.
5. Bail Application No. 367 of 2026 is disposed of as withdrawn.
(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Arjun