Bombay High Court
IA/417/2026 of THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER MSRTC Vs ARUN MANIKRAO MOHARE AND ORS on 6 October 2026
(C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 59 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 394 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 2225 OF 2026 The Divisional Controller MSRTC ...Applicant Versus Bhagyashree Chagan Kale And Ors ...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
59to62-Delay-IA-394-2026 (C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 59 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 394 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 2225 OF 2026 The Divisional Controller MSRTC ...Applicant Versus Bhagyashree Chagan Kale And Ors ...Respondents 60 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 419 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 2229 OF 2026 The Divisional Controller MSRTC ...Applicant Versus Janabai Devnarayan Kashid And Ors ...Respondents 61 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 415 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 2235 OF 2026 The Divisional Controller MSRTC ...Applicant Versus Rajshree Sambhaji Mahingade And Ors ...Respondents 62 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 417 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 2232 OF 2026 The Divisional Controller MSRTC ...Applicant Versus Arun Manikrao Mohare And Ors ...Respondents ….. Adv. Ketan Patil a/w Adv. Pinky Bhansali, Advocate for Applicant - MSRTC. Adv. R. S. Alange, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 in I.A. No. 394 of 2026, 1 to 4 in I.A. No. 419 of 2026, 1 to 3 in I.A. No. 415 of ZIP
59to62-Delay-IA-394-2026 (C).doc 2026 and 1 and 2 in I.A. No. 417 of 2026. …..
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 06th OCTOBER, 2026.
P.C. : By these applications, the applicant – Corporation is praying for condonation of delay.
2. No serious objections are raised by the respondents - claimants.
3. For the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and delay stands condoned.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] ZIP