Bombay High Court

IA/500/2026 of GANESH PRAKASH SAWANT AND ORS. Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 500 OF 2026 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO. 473 OF 2026 Ganesh Prakash Sawant And Ors. ...Intervenors IN THE MATTER BETWEEN Mrs Ashvini Nitin Yadav ...Applicant Versus

28-IA-500-2026.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 500 OF 2026

IN

BAIL APPLICATION NO. 473 OF 2026

Ganesh Prakash Sawant And Ors.

...Intervenors

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Mrs Ashvini Nitin Yadav

...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra And Anr.

...Respondents

_______________________________________________________________

Mr. Kuldeep Nikam, Advocate for the Applicants.

Mr. S. S. Chaudhari, APP for the Respondent – State.

Ms. Anamika Malhotra i/b Kamthe Prasad Arun, Advocate for the Applicant in Bail Application No. 473 of 2026.

_______________________________________________________________

CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

6th October, 2026.

P.C. :

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Mr. Kuldeep Nikam, learned Advocate for the Intervenors. He submits that by the present Application, the Complainant, at whose instance C.R. No. 721 of 2025, is registered at Sangli City Police Station, District Sangli, is seeking intervention in the Bail Application No. 473 of 2026.

2. The request made by Mr. Kuldeep Nikam, learned Advocate for the Intervenors, is not opposed by Ms. Anamika Malhotra, learned Advocate for the Applicant in Bail Application No. 473 of 2026 and Mr. Arjun

28-IA-500-2026.doc S. S. Chaudhari, learned APP for the Respondent – State.

3. In view of the no objection this Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). Consequently, the Intervenors are permitted to intervene in the Bail Application No. 473 of 2026, as “Intervenors”.

4. Ms. Anamika Malhotra, learned Advocate for the Applicant in Bail Application No. 473 of 2026, requests for permission to carryout amendment forthwith to add the “Intervenors” in Bail Application No. 473 of 2026. Permission granted. Amendment be carried out forthwith.

5. Interim Application No. 500 of 2026 is disposed of.

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) Arjun

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead