Bombay High Court
WP/4905/2026 of VIJAY BALASAHEB DHANE Vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPT. AND ORS. on 6 October 2026
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4905 OF 2026 Vijay Balasaheb Dhane ...Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra Through the Principal Secretary, Finance Department and Others ...Respondents
56-WP-4905-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 4905 OF 2026
Vijay Balasaheb Dhane
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Through the Principal Secretary, Finance Department and Others
...Respondents
——————
Mr. Mahesh V. Rawool a/w Mr. Neeraj Lavte - Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Ravindra Kadam – Advocate for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4
Mr. K. S. Thorat - AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 / State.
——————
Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh &
Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ.
Date : October 06, 2026.
P. C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The limited grievance of the Petitioner is that the representation dated 31.07.2024, forwarded by the Satara Zilla Parishad to the Chief Executive Oicer, has not been decided as yet. The Petitioner is seeking implementation of the Old Pension Scheme (OPS) as the recruitment process had started prior to 01.11.2005.
2. Considering the limited grievance, the Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No. 3 – Chief Executive Oicer to decide the representation of the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible and, in any event, within a period of six (6) weeks from today. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] SG Punde 1 of
1