Bombay High Court
EP/21/2025 of PRASHANT BABAN YADAV Vs SHEKHAR GOVINDRAO NIKAM on 5 October 2026
(C) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ELECTION PETITION NO. 21 OF 2025 Prashant Baban Yadav …...Petitioner Vs. Shekhar Govindrao Nikam …...Respondent WITH APPLICATION IN EP (STAMP) NO. 24935 OF 2025 IN ELECTION
1 74-EP-21-2025 (C)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT
BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ELECTION PETITION NO. 21 OF 2025
Prashant Baban Yadav
…...Petitioner
Vs.
Shekhar Govindrao Nikam
…...Respondent
WITH
APPLICATION IN EP (STAMP) NO. 24935 OF 2025
IN
ELECTION PETITION NO. 21 OF 2025
Prashant Baban Yadav
........Applicant
Vs.
Shekhar Govindarao Nikam
.......Respondent
WITH
APPLICATION IN ELECTION PETITION NO. 4 OF 2025
IN
ELECTION PETITION NO. 21 OF 2025
Shekhar Govindrao Nikam
…........Applicant
Vs.
Prashant Baban Yadav ….......Respondent
...
Mr. Kedar Lad with Ms. Poonam Dhotre, Advocate for Applicant/Petitioner.
Mr. G. Shubham i/b Mr. Harshad Bhadbhade, Advocate for Respondents.
…
CORAM :
SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE :
5TH OCTOBER, 2026.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER :
2 74-EP-21-2025 (C) . It is revealed from the record that time was sought by the Petitioner to comply with Section 109 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. No compliance was made, and the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner was also absent on a couple of occasions. By the last order dated 01.07.2026, time was again granted for compliance, and it was indicated that the matter would be dismissed for default.
3. Today, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner informs that no compliance has been made.
4. It appears that the Petitioner has lost interest in the matter. Hence, the Election Petition is dismissed for default. [ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ]
Suresh