Bombay High Court
MCA/445/2025 of KIRAN GANESH PAGARE Vs GANESH NANA PAGARE on 16 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 445 OF 2025 Kiran Ganesh Pagare … Applicant vs. Ganesh Nana Pagare … Respondent Ms. Sandhya Mailagir h/f. Ms. Suvarna Yadav for the Applicant. CORAM : GAURI GODSE,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 445 OF 2025
Kiran Ganesh Pagare
… Applicant
vs.
Ganesh Nana Pagare
… Respondent
Ms. Sandhya Mailagir h/f. Ms. Suvarna Yadav for the Applicant.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATED : 16th OCTOBER 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. This application is filed under Section 24 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (‘CPC’) by the wife seeking transfer of the marriage petition filed by the respondent from the Civil Court at Thane to the Family Court, Pune. As per the office report the respondent is served in terms of order dated 16th September 2026. Though served, none appears for the respondent.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is residing at Pune. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that considering the medical condition of the applicant she is unable to travel from Pune to Thane. The applicant has undergone knee varsha 21-mca-445-2025.doc surgery and is required to undergo regular check up and physiotherapy to the hospital at Pune. The applicant has no independent source of income. Hence, it would be inconvenient to the applicant and would cause hardship, if she is required to travel from Pune to Civil Court at Thane. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the respondent is in a better financial condition and would not face any difficulty if he is required to attend the Court at Pune. The medical papers are annexed to the application to support the applicant’s ground of inconvenience. She therefore submits that considering the distance between her place of residence at Pune and the Civil Court at Thane, she would not be able to travel in view of the financial constraint and medical condition. The respondent has neither filed any reply nor has appeared in the matter even though served.
3. I have perused the application and the supporting documents. The submissions made on behalf of the applicants are supported by particular pleadings in the application and the medical papers annexed to the application. Considering the medical condition, financial constraint and the distance between the applicant’s place of residence and the court at Thane, the applicant would suffer inconvenience and hardship if she is required to travel. Hence, the applicant has made out a case for transfer. Hence, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause(b) which reads as under: “b. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to transfer the H.M.P. No. 154 of 2025 from the Court of Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane to Ld. Family Court Pune.” (GAURI GODSE, J.)