Bombay High Court

WP/8343/2026 of ABHISHEK LAKHICHAND KHINVASARA Vs SHIRIN W/O MIYA MOHAMMED HUSSAIN CHOTANI AND ORS on 16 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8343 OF 2026 Abhishek Lakhichand Khinvasara ..Petitioner Versus Shirin W/o Miya Mohammed Hussain Chotani and Ors …Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8341 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8342 OF 2026 Mr. S. N.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO. 8343 OF 2026

Abhishek Lakhichand Khinvasara

..Petitioner

Versus

Shirin W/o Miya Mohammed Hussain Chotani and Ors …Respondents WITH

WRIT PETITION NO. 8341 OF 2026

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO. 8342 OF 2026

Mr. S. N. Gawade, with Mudita Pawar and Mihika Save, i/b Shree &

Co, for the Petitioner in All Petitions.

Mr. Asif Y Memon, for Respondent in WP/8343/2026.

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

16th OCTOBER 2026

P.C.:

WRIT PETITION NO. 8343 OF 2026 :

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2. The learned Counsel for the parties submit that the parties have amicably resolved the dispute and Consent Terms have been executed. The learned Counsel for the parties seeks leave to tender the Consent Terms. ARS

Leave granted. Consent Terms are taken on record.

3. Mr. Lakhichand Khinvasara, the power of attorney holder of the Petitioner-Plaintiff, Abhishek Lakhichand Khinvasara and Mr. Hadi Mohammed, son of Miya Mohammed Husain Chotani, the Respondent No.4, and the power of attorney holder of Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Respondent No.5, are present before the Court. Copies of the power of attorney are annexed to the Consent Terms.

4. The parties submit that they have read and understood the contents of the Consent Terms. The parties admit the contents of the Consent Terms and execution thereof. The parties are identified by their respective Advocates.

5. Respondent No.4 admits that the Respondents have received the amount mentioned in paragraph 10 of the Consent Terms.

6. It appears that the parties have amicably resolved the dispute and a comprehensive settlement of the dispute has been arrived at. There does not appear any coercion or duress.

7. Consent Terms are thus taken on record and marked “X”.

8. In view of the Consent Terms, thus Petition as well as the Suit No. 957 of 2026, stand disposed in accordance with the Consent Terms. WRIT PETITION NO. 8341 OF 2026 AND WRIT PETITION NO. 8342 OF 2026 : ARS

9. At the request of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners, stand over to 18th November 2026.

10. Ad-interim relief, granted earlier, shall continue to operate till the next date. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] ARS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead