Bombay High Court

IA/1372/2026 of RAMESH VILAS KUMBHAR Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA on 16 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

(P.A.) ININ THETHE HIGHHIGH COURTCOURT OFOF JUDICATUREJUDICATURE ATAT BOMBAYBOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1372 OF 2026 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO.830 OF 2024 Ramesh Vilas Kumbhar .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra ..

41.IA.1372.2026+.doc

HARSHADA H. SAWANT

(P.A.)

IN

IN THE

THE HIGH

HIGH COURT

COURT OF

OF JUDICATURE

JUDICATURE AT

AT BOMBAY

BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1372 OF 2026

IN

BAIL APPLICATION NO.830 OF 2024

Ramesh Vilas Kumbhar

.. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

.. Respondent

....................

Mr. Vaibhav Chandanshive, Advocate for Applicant.

Ms. Sangeeta E. Phad, APP for Respondent.

PSI – V. S. Loyare, Bharati Vidyapeeth Police Station.

...................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE

: OCTOBER 16, 2026

P.C.

:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Heard Mr. Chandanshive, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Phad, learned APP for Respondent.

2. Interim Application seeks deletion of condition No.(c) in the order dated 04.04.2024 passed in Bail Application No.830 of 2024.

3. Ms. Phad would vehemently oppose the relaxation of this condition. However, one needs to understand the reason as to why a person is externed and kept outside.

4. In the present case, it is prima facie seen that Applicant has already suffered the condition for more than two and half years and in that view of the matter, I am inclined to accept the request made by the Applicant.

41. IA.1372.2026+.doc

5. For the reasons stated in the Application, Interim Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) which reads thus:- “(b) The condition (c) in order dated 04/04/2024 passed in Criminal Bail Application No.830 of 2024 I.w. “”Except for attending the trial, the Applicant shall not enter the State of Maharashtra till the trial concludes.” may be relaxed and the Applicant may be allowed to enter into the limit of the state of Maharashtra.”

6. With the above directions, Interim Application is allowed and disposed. H. H. SAWANT [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead