Bombay High Court
BA/2334/2025 of SANTOSH MAGAN MAKWANA Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR on 16 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2334 OF 2025 Santosh Magan Makwana …Applicant V/s. The State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents Mr. Prashant Pandey a /w Adv. Ridhima Mangaonkar, Adv. Dinesh
MANOJ
921-BA-2334-2025.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2334 OF 2025
Santosh Magan Makwana
…Applicant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
…Respondents
Mr. Prashant Pandey a/w Adv. Ridhima Mangaonkar, Adv. Dinesh Jadhwani & Adv. Neha Balani i/by W3 Legal LLP, for the Applicant.
Mr. H.J. Dedhia, APP for the Respondent No.1-State.
Ms. Lochan Chandka, appointed Advocate for the Respondent No.2.
CORAM:
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.
DATED :
16th OCTOBER, 2026
P.C. :-
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. After hearing the application and appreciating the material on record, when this Court was not inclined to grant bail, Mr. Pandey, learned Counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the aforesaid Application. Further, he seeks liberty to renew his prayer for bail before this Court one year after framing of the charge, if the trial is not concluded within the said period of one year.
2. Leave and liberty to withdraw is granted.
3. Application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
4. The trial Court is requested to frame the charge on the next due date and expedite the trial. Further, the trial Court to ensure that both the accused are produced before it on every date for advancement of the case.
MANOJ 921-BA-2334-2025.DOC
5. Both the accused are directed to keep their Advocate present before the trial Court on each given date. The prosecution as well as accused shall avoid unwanted adjournments.
6. The copy of this Order be communicated to the trial Court. (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)