Bombay High Court
IA/17951/2022 of SHASHIKANT HARI PHADKE (DECEASED THE .LRS) SMT. SHUBHA SHASHIKANT PHADKE AND ORS Vs SHRIKANT HARI PHADKE (DECEASED THR.LRS) SPHURTI SHRIKANT PHADKE AND ORS on 16 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 618 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17951 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 618 OF 2022 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 776 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 20409 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 776
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Sonali Mane 904-SA-618-2022.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 618 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 17951 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 618 OF 2022 WITH SECOND APPEAL NO. 776 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 20409 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 776 OF 2022 Shashikant Hari Phadke (Decd.) Thr. Lrs. Smt. Shubha Shashikant Phadke And Ors. … Appellants Versus Shrikant Hari Phadke (Decd.) Thr. Lrs. Sphurti Shrikant Phadke And Ors … Respondents Mr. Omkar Warange for the Appellants. Mr. Namit Pansare i/b Mr. Drupad S. Patil for Respondents.
CORAM
: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 16 OCTOBER 2026.
___Page No.
1 of
2 ___
16 October, 2026 Sonali Mane 904-SA-618-2022.docx P.C. :
Leave to amend granted. M/s M. P. Builders and Developer be added as Respondent No.2 in both the Appeals. Amendment to be carried out forthwith.
The learned counsel appearing for parties jointly submit that the parties have amicably resolved the disputes amongst them. The consent terms are signed by the Appellants and by constituted attorney of Respondent No.1, who happens to be the partner of Respondent No.2.
Signatories to the consent terms are personally present before the Court. I have interacted with them, and they admit their signatures on the consent terms as well as contents thereof. The consent terms are taken on record and marked “X” for identification in each of the Second Appeals.
The Second Appeals are disposed of in view of the consent terms.
In view of disposal of Second Appeals, nothing survive in the Interim Applications and the same stand disposed of. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
___Page No.
2 of
2 ___
16 October, 2026