Bombay High Court
REVN/529/2026 of Raghuvendra Rasik Sugandhi Vs The State of Maharashtra on 16 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 529 OF 2026 Raghuvendra Rasik Sugandhi … Applicant V/s The State Of Maharashtra & Anr. ....Respondents **** Mr. Tohid Shaikh i/b. Ms. Anjali Patil for Applicant.
904-REVN-529-2026.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 529 OF 2026
Raghuvendra Rasik Sugandhi
… Applicant
V/s
The State Of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Respondents
****
Mr. Tohid Shaikh i/b. Ms. Anjali Patil for Applicant.
Mr. Sagar Agarkar, APP for Respondent/State.
PSI-Harish Patil, Kashigaon Police Station, present.
****
CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.
DATE : 16th OCTOBER, 2026
P.C. :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Learned counsel for the Applicant fairly submitted that after the impugned order is passed (rejecting discharge application) charges are already framed.
2. Learned APP has relied upon judgment of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Vs. Raj Kumar Aroa & Ors. (Criminal Appeal No.1319 of 2023 with connected appeal, Judgment dated 17.04.2025, Supreme Court) contending that once charges are framed, the only option available under the procedure is either to convict or acquit the accused.
3. Learned counsel for the Applicant therefore, seeks leave to withdraw the application.
4. Revision application is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) Husen 1