Bombay High Court
CP/333/2026 of Baliram Nama Pardeshi Vs Vijay Singhal on 16 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 278 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8037 OF 2024 Janardan Chandar Patil (since deceased), Through legal heirs … Petitioners vs. Vijay Singhal and others … Respondents AND CONTEMPT
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
913-915_CP_278, 332, 333_26.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 278 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8037 OF 2024 Janardan Chandar Patil (since deceased), Through legal heirs … Petitioners vs. Vijay Singhal and others … Respondents AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 332 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 16153 OF 2025 Kana @ Kanha Chahu Keni and others … Petitioners vs. Vijay Singhal and others … Respondents AND CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 333 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 13108 OF 2025 Baliram Nama Pardeshi … Petitioner vs. Vijay Singhal … Respondent Ms. Deepa Punde a/w. Mr. Atharva U., i/b. Mr. Sachin Punde for petitioners. Mr. Soham Bhalerao, i/b. DSK Legal for respondent – CIDCO. Ms. Tanu N. Bhatia, AGP for respondent – State in CP/278/2026 & CP/332/2026. Ms. G. R. Raghuwanshi, AGP for respondent – State in CP/333/2026. CORAM : MANISH PITALE & SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, JJ DATE : 16th OCTOBER, 2026
913-915_CP_278, 332, 333_26.doc P.C. : Contempt Petition No.332 of 2026: . The learned counsel for the petitioners confirms the fact that the respondents have complied with the directions issued by this Court and that the petitioners have received the compensation amount.
2. Hence, the contempt petition is disposed of upon recording compliance. Contempt Petition No.278 of 2026 and Contempt Petition No.333 of 2026:
3. In these petitions, the learned counsel for the petitioners confirms the fact that the respondents have complied with the directions issued by this Court. But, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the amount towards compensation deposited by the respondents before the Reference Court, is awaiting disbursal to the petitioners in these petitions.
4. We are also informed that applications for withdrawal have been filed. But necessary orders have not been passed by the presiding officer of the Reference Court.
5. In view of the above, it is recorded that the respondents have complied with the directions issued by this Court. The Reference Court is directed to ensure that appropriate orders are passed and the amounts deposited towards compensation are disbursed to the petitioners within two weeks from today, if not already disbursed.
6. Contempt petitions are disposed of. (SHREERAM V. SHIRSAT, J.) (MANISH PITALE, J.)
Priya Kambli