Bombay High Court
WP/4470/2026 of SONA SHIVBABU SINGH Vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS on 16 October 2026
skt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4470 OF 2026 Sona Shivbabu Singh …Petitioner Vs. 1. State of Maharashtra 2. Divisional Commissioner Kokan Division, Belapur, Navi Mumbai 3. Deputy Commissioner of Police,
8 WP-4470-2026.DOC
skt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4470 OF 2026
Sona Shivbabu Singh
…Petitioner
Vs.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. State of Maharashtra
2. Divisional Commissioner Kokan Division, Belapur, Navi Mumbai
3. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-VI
4. Assistant Commissioner of Police
5. Senior Inspector of Police …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 19084 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4470 OF 2026 Ramjanam Rambachan Yadav …Applicant Vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. …Respondents Mr. Shashikant P. Chaudhari a/w. Snehal S. Chaudhari, Manojkumar Singh, Puneet Shukla, Gyanprakash Pal, Pranot Pawar and Sarita Pal i/b Snehal S. Chaudhari, for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.R. Tidke, APP for the State. Mr. Tuushar N. Sonawane a/w. Pooja D. Satpute, for the Applicant in IAST-19084-2026.
CORAM:
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 16th OCTOBER, 2026 P. C.:
1. This Writ Petition was filed on the ground that although the statutory appeal under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act was heard, no order had been passed therein.
16th October, 2026
8 WP-4470-2026.DOC skt
2. Ms. Tidke, learned APP states that during the pendency of this Writ Petition, the Divisional Commissioner, Kokan Division, disposed of Appeal No. 106 of 2026 by order dated 27th August 2026.
3. In view of the aforesaid subsequent development, Mr. Chaudhari, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition.
4. Leave as sought is granted.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. However, contentions of both the parties are expressly kept open.
6. In view of disposal of the Writ Petition, nothing survives in the Interim Application, the said Interim Application also stands disposed of. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
16th October, 2026